From Yellow Pages to Digital ID: the Future of Screening

BLOGBy Rullion on 06 October 2025

In this edition of Confessions of a Screening Expert, Phil Bel, Candidate Services Team Leader at Rullion, shares how background screening services have evolved from paper packs to digital-first Background Screening. He explains why human support still matters in DBS checks, Right to Work checks, and employment reference checks - and why innovations like rapid verification could transform the future of candidate screening. 

From Yellow Pages packs to digital-first 

Step into the office of a background screener in 2014 and you’d see a very different world. Printers churning non-stop, fax machines whirring, and stacks of paper files piled high on desks. 

“When I started, the screening packs were as thick as the Yellow Pages,” recalls Phil Bell, Candidate Services Team Leader at Rullion. “Printers were constantly running, scanners were working overtime, and every single page had to be put in the right order for approval. Then you’d have to scan the whole lot again, convert it into a PDF, and email it across. And still keep the hard copies in case of audit.” 

It was slow and manual labour. Fast forward a decade, and most pre-employment screening journeys are now completed digitally through secure portals. But as Phil suggests, just because you can automate, doesn’t always mean you should. 

Why not everything should be automated 

Automation has streamlined many tasks in background screening services, but over-reliance can backfire. For tasks like Right to Work checks and DBS checks, automation speeds things up. But when it comes to employment reference checks, removing people from the process often slows things down instead of speeding them up. 

“Sometimes a phone call is better than another email,” Phil says. “If I call a referee, I can explain what we need, answer their questions, and build a connection. A single conversation can cut through weeks of delay.” 

The lesson? Automation should support, not replace, human judgement. Referees and candidates value clarity and reassurance, and that’s not something a chaser email can deliver. 

The promise of rapid employment verification 

One that stands out for him is rapid employment verification: a tool that connects directly to HMRC, payroll, and open banking records (with candidate consent). 

“Instead of spending weeks chasing down referees, the system can instantly verify where someone has worked and for how long,” Phil explains. “That cuts out admin, reduces errors, and gets candidates cleared much quicker.” 

The benefits are clear: 

  • Faster onboarding for clients in time-critical projects. 

  • Less frustration for candidates who just want to start work. 

  • Efficiency gains for screening teams, freeing up time to focus on problem cases. 

But Phil is also realistic about the challenges. Consent will always be critical, candidates must feel comfortable with how their data is being used, and clients need to be ready to embrace the technology. Until both sides are confident, adoption will remain limited. 
 
Still, as improvements are rolled out, Phil believes rapid verification has the potential to transform how employment reference checks are managed, cutting down on delays and eliminating much of the manual chasing that slows the process today. This echoes what we’ve seen first-hand on major projects like Hinkley Point C where speed and compliance must go hand in hand. Read more in How Rullion Delivers Screening Success at Hinkley Point C. 

Smarter, not colder: the role of AI 

Phil also sees a clear role for artificial intelligence in pre-employment screening. For him, it’s not about replacing people but about making processes more reliable. At present, portals depend on candidates entering every detail correctly - but even something as small as a mistyped referee email address can cause the whole process to grind to a halt. 

This is where AI could add real value. Smart systems could flag incorrect information at the point of entry, ask intelligent follow-up questions, or even validate data against public sources. By catching errors early, the process becomes smoother for candidates, referees, and clients alike. 

Phil sums it up: “AI won’t replace advisors, but it can help us eliminate mistakes earlier and get people cleared faster. It’s about making the process smarter, not colder.” 

From science fiction to reality: digital ID 

When asked whether screening could ever become instantaneous, with each person carrying a unique identifier, like a cryptocurrency token - Phil admits it once felt like science fiction.  

Yet within a short amount of time of this interview, the UK Government announced its plans for digital ID cards, bringing the concept closer to reality. Across Europe, adoption is already well underway: Estonia’s e-ID has been in place for nearly 20 years, saving citizens an average of five working days each year, while Denmark’s MitID is now used by over 90% of the population. The EU has also committed to launching a Digital Identity Wallet by 2026, giving all citizens a secure, standardised way to prove who they are. 

He reflects: “Every worker already has a National Insurance number, and government gateways already give access to some records. So, a seamless digital ID isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds.” 

These global examples show that the debate is no longer about whether digital ID will arrive, but how it will be implemented and trusted. Linking records into a universal digital identity system could drastically reduce the time and effort involved in screening. Done well, it would give candidates more control over their information and employers greater confidence in its accuracy. 

Action points for employers 

Phil’s reflections don’t just highlight how far the industry has come, they also point to practical steps organisations can take now: 

  • Audit your processes: Identify where automation helps and where it hinders. For tasks like Right to Work checks and DBS checks, automation saves time; for references, human contact may still be best. 

  • Prepare for rapid verification: Start conversations with candidates about consent and data-sharing, so you’re ready to adopt new tools quickly. 

  • Invest in data quality: Choose systems that help catch errors early and reduce reliance on manual corrections. 

  • Keep the human touch: Balance is key. A process that relies entirely on automation risks losing candidates, but too much manual intervention creates delays. Getting this mix right is what keeps projects moving. 

Why balance wins 

Phil’s perspective is clear: the future of screening isn’t about choosing between people and technology but combining both. Tools like rapid employment verification and AI will undoubtedly shape the industry, but they work best when paired with real advisors who understand the needs of candidates and clients. 

“At the end of the day, candidates just want to get cleared quickly so they can start work. Clients want the same: people on site as soon as possible,” he says. “By blending technology with genuine human support, we can deliver speed, compliance, and a better experience for everyone.” 

It’s this combination, smart automation with real human guidance, that defines Rullion’s approach to background screening services. It means clients in critical infrastructure sectors like nuclear, transport and rail, and utilities can get the best of both worlds: the speed of automation with the reassurance of people who care. 

Share
Need background screening that balances speed with support?

Rullion’s proven background screening services combine smart technology with dedicated advisors to deliver fast, compliant results across critical infrastructure sectors like nuclear, transport and rail, and utilities.

More like this

NEWS
Rullion strengthens fusion presence with Culham Campus office

Rullion strengthens fusion presence with Culham Campus office

Rullion has relocated its Fusion team to a new office at Culham Campus, strengthening its presence at the centre of the UK’s fusion community. The team has long supported organisations based at Culham, but establishing a new home on campus marks a deeper commitment to the fusion sector. As the site continues to grow as a hub for fusion research, technology development, and commercial collaboration, being embedded within that environment enables closer working relationships across the wider fusion ecosystem, including organisations such as the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA). John Shepherd, Client Services Director, shared his perspective on strengthening Rullion’s presence at the heart of the fusion sector: “Culham Campus sits at the centre of the UK’s fusion community. Having our team based here reflects how important it is to work alongside the organisations driving this technology forward. Fusion represents a major opportunity for the future of energy, and delivering it will depend on building a workforce with highly specialised skills. Our role is to support that growth by connecting organisations with the talent they need, both in the UK and internationally.” Rullion is a proud member of the Fusion Skills Council and continues to play an active role in addressing the workforce demands facing the sector. As fusion moves from research into increasingly complex engineering and commercial programmes, access to specialist capability is becoming more significant. The team supports both contingent hiring and permanent hiring across highly technical disciplines, including: Plasma Physicists Tritium Fuel Cycle Engineers Cryogenics Consultants Tokamak specialists Robotics Engineers Alongside this, Rullion has expanded its international recruitment capability, supporting global mobility and bringing expertise to the UK where it is needed. This enables fusion organisations to access talent from established scientific and engineering markets including: Australia France Italy Switzerland By basing the team at Culham Campus, Rullion is reinforcing its position as a leading recruitment partner within the fusion sector and strengthening the relationships that will shape the next phase of fusion energy development.

By Rullion on 04 March 2026

NEWS
Rullion Named in the UK’s Top 20 Largest Staffing Firms by SIA

Rullion Named in the UK’s Top 20 Largest Staffing Firms by SIA

Rullion has been named by Staffing Industry Analysts (SIA) as one of the 20 largest staffing firms in the UK, recognising the scale of our role as a leading recruitment and workforce solutions provider nationwide and across Europe. The annual ranking places Rullion alongside the country’s leading providers supporting organisations with complex hiring and workforce challenges. Across critical infrastructure sectors including energy, nuclear, rail, and utilities, Rullion works in partnership with organisations to build and manage skilled project teams and wider workforce programmes that support long-term delivery. This can range from scaling engineering capability for major capital projects to overseeing managed service models that bring structure and consistency to high-volume hiring. Rullion’s services span permanent recruitment, temporary recruitment, and managed workforce solutions, including MSP and RPO models that support organisations through periods of transformation and long-term infrastructure investment. By combining sector expertise with flexible workforce delivery, Rullion helps clients improve workforce planning and strengthen access to scarce skills, all while maintaining continuity across complex national programmes. “This recognition reflects the work our teams do every day alongside our customers delivering critical infrastructure across the UK and Europe. The challenges our clients face require deep sector understanding and workforce solutions that adapt as projects evolve. Being named among the UK’s largest staffing firms is a result of the strong partnerships we’ve built and the practical, high-quality recruitment support we continue to deliver.” – Lindsay Harrison, Chief Customer Officer The SIA ranking provides independent recognition of Rullion’s continued growth as a workforce solutions provider supporting organisations responsible for some of the UK’s most important infrastructure programmes.

By Rullion on 26 February 2026

Executive Search Trends 2026 | The Future of Senior Leadership Hiring

Executive Search Trends 2026 | The Future of Senior Leadership Hiring

The executive search landscape in 2026 is being reshaped by large-scale investment across critical UK infrastructure, the energy transition, engineering programmes, and regulated industries. Projects such as energy grid reinforcements, utilities modernisations, large transport programmes, and nuclear new builds like Sizewell C and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are swiftly moving from planning into execution. At the same time, scrutiny from regulators, the media, and the government has intensified. For boards operating in these environments, senior leadership appointments now carry operational, reputational, and political weight. Executive search is no longer about identifying experienced profiles. It is about identifying leaders who can translate large-scale investment into safe, consistent delivery across high-risk environments. For organisations operating within core critical infrastructure programmes, understanding the shifts in executive search trends is becoming essential to securing the right leadership. Jump to: What are the biggest shifts in executive recruitment? What are senior candidates looking for in 2026? AI in executive search and boardroom strategy Workforce transition is no longer an HR issue Future skills required for C-suite roles Where executive leadership is headed What are the biggest shifts in executive recruitment? Political risk now influences executive decision-making One of the most significant executive search industry trends is not internal to organisations. Senior candidates are increasingly evaluating political stability and funding certainty before stepping into major roles. Infrastructure projects often depend on multi-year government commitment. When policy shifts or investment timelines change, the public face of delivery is the executive team. “There’s a real concern among senior leaders about the political risk attached to major infrastructure roles. You can join a project where investment is promised, then nothing happens for years. That uncertainty now plays heavily into whether executives will step into these positions.” – Asif Salam, Practice Director | Executive Search For boards, this means executive candidate sourcing must confront the reputational exposure attached to major programmes and provide clarity on how political backing and funding decisions will be sustained over time. Delivery discipline is replacing vision as the defining leadership measure In highly regulated sectors, senior leaders are being judged on whether projects are delivered safely and competently. There is growing recognition that insufficient upfront planning, weak engineering definition and compressed timelines create long-term operational risk. Executives brought into complex programmes are inheriting decisions made years earlier. Future executive appointments in nuclear, utilities and energy will be evaluated on governance rigour and execution capability as much as strategic direction. In a recent interview, Asif reflected on the biggest challenge leaders are facing right now: “It’s simply getting projects built. Historically, the work was done properly upfront. Engineering, planning, supply chain readiness. Now projects often start before that foundation is in place, and executives are left managing the fallout.” Cyber resilience has become a core executive responsibility Another clear executive search trend is the elevation of cybersecurity to board level. Legacy critical infrastructure systems were not designed for the scale of digital threat now facing them. These platforms in water treatment, transport, and energy networks were built for operational efficiency, not hostile attack environments. Recent cyber incidents affecting major UK organisations, such as Jaguar Land Rover, where production was disrupted for weeks following an attack on core systems, have underlined how quickly digital breaches become operational and financial crises. The cost of a successful attack on critical infrastructure sites could be far greater. It’s no longer something that can just sit with IT anymore. Executives are now expected to understand business continuity exposure/vulnerabilities and supply chain interdependencies as part of their strategic risk management. What are senior candidates looking for in 2026? The motivations of senior candidates have become more nuanced. Compensation remains relevant. However, the decision to move into a new executive role is increasingly shaped by structural and personal considerations. Certainty of mandate and authority Senior leaders want clarity on what they are empowered to change. In regulated infrastructure environments, governance layers can dilute authority. Executives are more likely to step into roles where the decision-making framework is defined and where accountability aligns with influence. Ambiguity around political backing or board alignment is becoming a deal-breaker. Long-term impact over short-term optics Many executives are assessing roles based on tangible contribution. Infrastructure leaders are aware that their work can affect national resilience, decarbonisation targets, transport safety, and energy security. The opportunity to shape delivery in these areas carries weight. There is also a noticeable openness to joining smaller or specialist organisations where influence is more direct, provided that programme stability exists. Leadership environments that allow delegation The complexity of infrastructure projects makes micromanagement ineffective. Asif highlights the importance of empowering capable teams: “The best leaders are flexible across sectors. They hire strong people and empower them. What can go wrong is the temptation to micromanage. In these environments, you cannot afford single points of failure.” Senior candidates are increasingly evaluating whether they will be able to build capable leadership layers beneath them, rather than firefighting alone. AI in executive search and boardroom strategy AI is often discussed in relation to recruitment efficiency, but in infrastructure it carries broader implications. In executive search, AI tools are being used to analyse leadership trajectories, map sector crossover talent, and identify capability adjacencies across industries. At board level, however, AI is a structural issue. “AI isn’t an IT upgrade. It’s a strategic inflection point. It reshapes talent, risk, customer engagement, and even regulatory relationships. The strongest leaders are treating it as a business model shift.” Asif Salam. For regulated industries, AI introduces governance and ethics as well as workforce adaptation challenges. Leaders must understand how automation affects legacy systems and employee capability. Executives are not expected to be data scientists; they are, however, expected to understand strategic implications and how their actions may also impact stakeholder trust. Workforce transition is no longer an HR issue One of the most pressing challenges in critical infrastructure is demographic. Experienced engineers and operators are retiring. And with ongoing digital transformation across industries, digital and systems expertise is required at scale. The overlap between these capabilities is limited. Boards are therefore prioritising senior candidates who can oversee workforce transformation while maintaining safety and regulatory standards. This has direct implications for executive search trends in 2026. Talent mapping must extend beyond traditional pipelines. Future skills required for C-suite roles Across critical infrastructure programmes, the profile of successful C-suite talent is evolving. Technical credibility remains important. However, executive candidate sourcing is increasingly assessing: Judgement under regulatory scrutiny The ability to manage long investment cycles Clarity of communication with government and public stakeholders Comfort with digital transformation in legacy systems Self-awareness and adaptability Where executive leadership is headed Infrastructure organisations are expanding their executive structures to reflect new risk landscapes. In addition to traditional operational leadership roles, there is a bigger focus on: Chief Risk Officer and resilience roles Digital and information governance leadership Chief AI Officer and data oversight functions Culture and workforce transformation leadership What this means for organisations hiring executive talent Executive search trends in 2026 show that senior leadership appointments in regulated industries now sit at the centre of political exposure, operational delivery, digital risk, and workforce transition. Organisations competing for C-suite talent must demonstrate programme stability and clear governance, alongside a credible long-term vision for delivery. In parallel, executive search partners need deep sector understanding, access to leadership talent beyond traditional pipelines, and the ability to evaluate strategic judgement in complex environments. At this level, the cost of the wrong appointment is increasingly high.

By Asif Salam on 18 February 2026